Top.Mail.Ru

Scientific and technical journal

«Equipment and technologies for oil and gas complex»

ISSN 1999-6934

The use of neural networks in hydrodynamic modeling of underground gas storage facilities

UDC: 622.691.4:004.896
DOI: -

Authors:

STARTSEV NIKITA I.1,
MIKHAILOV NIKOLAY N.2,3

1 Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
2 National University of Oil and Gas "Gubkin University", Moscow, Russia
3 Oil and Gas Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Keywords: neural network, underground gas storage, hydrodynamic and geological models

Annotation:

The authors of the article describe the geological and technological criteria of selecting a reservoir layer for gas storage as well as analyze in detail the use of various neural networks in hydrodynamic modeling of underground gas storage facilities. The authors study the possibilities of using neural networks to improve the accuracy and efficiency of modeling processes associated with underground gas storage. The authors of the article consider the basic principles of neural networks operation and their application in hydrodynamics. The results of the study may be useful for the development of more accurate and reliable models of underground gas storage facilities.

Bibliography:

1. Mo Tszyali, Mikhaylov N.N. Dinamicheskiy analiz razrabotki neftyanykh mestorozhdeniy na osnove iskusstvennoy neyronnoy seti obratnogo rasprostraneniya oshibki // Neftepromyslovoe delo. – 2023. – № 5(653). – S. 13–20. – DOI: 10.33285/0207-2351-2023-5(653)-13-20
2. Doughty C. Investigation of CO2 Plume Behavior for a Large-Scale Pilot Test of Geologic Carbon Storage in a Saline Formation // Transport in Porous Media. – 2010. – Vol. 82, Issue 1. – P. 49–76. – DOI: 10.1007/s11242-009-9396-z
3. Gege Wen, Benson S.M. CO2 plume migration and dissolution in layered reservoirs // Int. J. of Greenhouse Gas Control. – 2019. – Vol. 87. – P. 66–79. – DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.05.012
4. Eremyan G.A., Rukavishnikov V.S. Kriterii kachestva avtomatizirovannoy adaptatsii geologo-gidrodinamicheskoy modeli mestorozhdeniya uglevodorodov // Ekspozitsiya Neft' Gaz. – 2020. – № 6(79). – S. 76–79.
5. Yinhao Zhu, Zabaras N. Bayesian Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks for Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantification // J. of Computational Physics. – 2018. – Vol. 366. – P. 415–447. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.018
6. Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks for Uncertainty Quantification of Dynamic Multiphase Flow in Heterogeneous Media / Shaoxing Mo, Yinhao Zhu, N. Zabaras [et al.] // Water Resources Research. – 2019. – Vol. 55, Issue 1. – P. 703–728. – DOI: 10.1029/2018WR023528
7. Zhi Zhong, Sun A.Y., Hoonyoung Jeong. Predicting CO2 Plume Migration in Heterogeneous Formations Using Conditional Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network // Water Resources Research. – 2019. – Vol 55, Issue 7. – P. 5830–5851. – DOI: 10.1029/2018WR024592
8. Gege Wen, Meng Tang, Benson S.M. Towards a predictor for CO2 plume migration using deep neural networks // Int. J. of Greenhouse Gas Control. – 2021. – Vol. 105. – P. 103223. – DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103223
9. Gege Wen, Hay C., Benson S.M. CCSnet: A deep learning modeling suite for CO2 storage // Advances in Water Resources. – 2021. – Vol. 155. – P. 104009. – DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104009
10. Zhihao Jiang, Tahmasebi P., Zhiqiang Mao. Deep Residual U-net Convolution Neural Networks with Autoregressive Strategy for Fluid Flow Predictions in Large-scale Geosystems // Advances in Water Resources. – 2021. – Vol. 150. – P. 103878. – DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.103878
11. Raissi M., Perdikaris P., Karniadakis G.E. Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems Involving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations // J. of Computational Physics. – 2019. – Vol. 378. – P. 686–707. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
12. Lu Lu, Pengzhan Jin, Karniadakis G.E. DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. – 2019. – 22 p. – DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1910.03193
13. Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations / Zongyi Li, N. Kovachki, K. Azizzadenesheli [et al.]. – 2020. – 17 p. – DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2006.09535
14. Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equations / Zongyi Li, N. Kovachki, K. Azizzadenesheli [et al.]. – 2020. – 21 p. – URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03485
15. Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations / Zongyi Li, N. Kovachki, K. Azizzadenesheli [et al.]. – 2020. – 16 p. – DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2010.08895
16. U-FNO – an enhanced Fourier neural operator-based deep-learning model for multiphase flow / Gege Wen, Zongyi Li, K. Azizzadenesheli [et al.]. – 2022. – 37 p. – DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2109.03697
17. Pruess K., Oldenburg C.M., Moridis G. Tough 2 User's Guide: Version 2. – Berkeley, CA, United States: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1999. – XII, 198 p.