«Problems of economics and management of oil and gas complex»

Problems of ensuring pipeline transport safety

UDC: 658.1
DOI: 10.33285/1999-6942-2023-3(219)-5-10

Authors:

¹ Institute for National Economic Forecasts of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Keywords: transport, pipeline transport, safety, safety of pipeline transport, safety provision, safety system, emergency shutdown system, optimization of the safety system

Annotation:

In modern conditions, pipeline transport is one of the most important elements of the production infrastructure, which means much both within the country and at the global level. Therefore, its stable functioning in one way or another determines the direction of economic growth in the country. However, this specific type of transport is associated with risks and safety problems that arise both at the stage of pipelines design and construction and at the stage of their further operation. Timely assessment of risks and problems allows reducing the level of resource losses and the impact of risk in all directions. That’s why, in order to ensure the safety of pipeline transport, a high-quality and effective emergency protection system is required, which is especially important for oil refineries. The article considers the features and advantages of pipeline transport, the need to ensure its safety. The reasons of failures and accidents of pipeline transport as well as their aftereffect in the surrounding world are presented. The measures ensuring pipeline transport safety and the associated problems are described. The article also presents the developed mathematical model of the emergency shutdown system of the pipeline transport section in its relationship with the technology of oil and gas production and processing. This model is based on the stochastic process of occurrence of failures and critical modes of technologies, it is developed taking into account international standards for functional safety of production and allows determining the required reliability parameters for a specific version of the security systems specification.

Bibliography:

1. Lopatin A.S. Energosberezhenie pri truboprovodnom transporte prirodnogo gaza // Territoriya Neftegaz. – 2010. – № 3. – S. 88–93.
2. Korshak A.A., Korobkov G.E. Obespechenie nadezhnoy raboty magistral'nykh nefteproduktoprovodov. – Ufa: Ufimskiy neftyanoy in-t., 1993. – 148 s.
3. Dolgopolov D.V., Melkiy V.A., Verkhoturov A.A. Geoinformatsionnoe obespechenie bezopasnoy ekspluatatsii truboprovodnogo transporta // Izv. TPU. Inzhiniring georesursov. – 2021. – T. 332, № 12. – S. 52–63. – DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2021/12/3028
4. Skifskaya A.L., Skifskaya K.N. Magistral'nyy truboprovodnyy transport nefti i nefteproduktov: upravlencheskiy aspekt deyatel'nosti // Innovatsii i investitsii. – 2020. – № 10. – S. 237–240.
5. Analiz avariynykh situatsiy i ikh posledstviy na magistral'nykh nefteprovodakh / M.A. Stadnikova, E.V. Glebova, A.V. Muradov, L.E. Sheynkman // Ekologiya i prom-st' Rossii. – 2009. – № 8. – S. 22–24.
6. Rusetskaya G.D. Ispol'zovanie metodov sistemnogo analiza sostoyaniya ekosistem pri stroitel'stve i ekspluatatsii magistral'nykh nefte- i gazoprovodov // Izv. Irkutskoy gos. ekonom. akad. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 152–155.
7. Izgagina T.Yu. Nekotorye voprosy obespecheniya bezopasnosti na truboprovodnom transporte // Yurid. vestn. Samarskogo un-ta. – 2021. – T. 7, № 3. – S. 91–101. – DOI: 10.18287/2542-047X-2021-7-3-91-101
8. Olaquer E.P. Atmospheric Impacts of the Oil and Gas Industry. – Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016. – 170 p.
9. Ecological risk assessments to guide decision-making: Methodology matters / G.J. Piet, A.M. Knights, R.H. Jongbloed [et al.] // Environmental Science and Policy. – 2017. – Vol. 68. – P. 1–9. – DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.009
10. Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2001. – 31 dek. (№ 256(2868)). – S. 4–14.
11. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 1996. – № 25. – St. 2954.
12. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast' vtoraya) ot 26.01.1996 № 14-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 1996. – № 5. – St. 410.
13. Ob okhrane okruzhayushchey sredy: Feder. zakon ot 10.01.2002 № 7-FZ // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2002. – 12 yanv. (№ 6(2874)). – S. 4–7.
14. Ob ekologicheskoy ekspertize: Feder. zakon ot 23.11.1995 № 174-FZ (red. ot 28.12.2017) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 1995. – 30 noyab. (№ 232(1343)). – S. 3–5.
15. Ob utverzhdenii Federal'nykh norm i pravil v oblasti promyshlennoy bezopasnosti "Pravila bezopasnosti dlya opasnykh proizvodstvennykh ob"ektov magistral'nykh truboprovodov": Prikaz Rostekhnadzora ot 06.11.2013 № 520 (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste Rossii 16.12.2013 № 30605) // Byul. normativnykh aktov feder. organov ispoln. vlasti. – 2014. – № 1.
16. Dolgopolov D.V. Geoprostranstvo truboprovodnogo transporta // Vestn. SGUGiT (Sib. gos. un-ta geosistem i tekhnologiy). – 2021. – T. 26, № 1. – S. 76–85. – DOI: 10.33764/2411-1759-2021-26-1-76-85
17. Revazov A.M., Alekperova S.T., Sadova I.L. Planirovanie meropriyatiy po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti magistral'nykh truboprovodov // Gazovaya prom-st'. – 2018. – № 12(778). – S. 86–92.
18. Zhuravlev I.V., Mineev D.I., Shumkov V.O. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya gazosnabzheniya i gazifikatsii Dal'nego Vostoka na primere Magadanskoy oblasti // Problemy ekonomiki i upravleniya neftegazovym kompleksom. – 2022. – № 12(216). – S. 41–45. – DOI: 10.33285/1999-6942-2022-12(216)-41-45
19. Gorlenko N.V., Murzin M.A., Timofeeva S.S. Kompleksnaya otsenka ekologicheskikh riskov ob"ektov neftegazodobychi // Transport i khranenie nefteproduktov i uglevodorodnogo syr'ya. – 2020. – № 1. – S. 48–52. – DOI: 10.24411/0131-4270-2020-10110
20. Gruhn P., Cheddie H. Safety Shutdown Systems: Design, Analysis and Justification. – Research Triangle Park, NC, US: The Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society, 1998. – 239 p.