«Proceedings of Gubkin University»

Assessment of technogenic risk of hazardous geological processes

UDC: 622.692.4
DOI: 10.33285/2073-9028-2022-1(306)-98-106

Authors:

¹ Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (National Research University), Moscow, Russian Federation

Keywords: main gas pipelines, technogenic risk, monitoring, dangerous geological processes, natural pulsed electromagnetic field of the Earth, geodynamic safety

Annotation:

Dangerous natural processes (seismicity, landslides, karsts, etc.) are one of the causes of accidents on pipelines both in our country and abroad. At the same time, diagnostic methods and tools implemented in the system of diagnostic maintenance of main gas pipelines (MGP) do not allow their prediction, while the methodology used in the industry for quantitative analysis of the risk of accidents on the linear part of MGP in the zone of influence of hazardous geological processes needs improvement. The article considers proposals for its improvement and the use of the method of the natural pulsed electromagnetic field of the Earth to predict dangerous geological processes.

Bibliography:

1. Vlasova L.V. Ocenka vliyaniya prirodnyh vozdejstvij v zadachah obespecheniya nadezhnoj i bezopasnoj ekspluatacii gazotransportnoj sistemy PAO “Gazprom”. Vesti gazovoj nauki, 2017, no. 1 (29), p. 49–56.
2. Risk assessment of accidents due to natural factors at the Pascuales – Cuenca multiple-use pipeline (Ecuador). J. Zambrano, S.V. Kovshov, E.A. Lyubin. Zapisky Gornogo Instituta, 2018, vol. 230, p. 190–196.
3. Performance of European cross-country oil pipelines. Statistical summary of reported spillages in 2011 and since 1971. P.M. Davis, J.-M. Diaz, F. Gambardella et al. Brussels: CONCAWE, 2013, 61 p.
4. Ocenka parametrov nadezhnosti magistral’nyh gazoprovodov, ispytyvayushchih vozdejstvie neproektnyh nagruzok. K.B. Gusejnov, S.I. Egorov, A.P. Zav’yalov, A.S. Lopatin. M.: IC RGU nefti i gaza, 2015, 96 p.
5. R Gazprom 2-2.3-903-2014. Metodika rascheta riskov na osnove dinamicheskoj ocenki opasnosti prirodnyh processov. Sankt-Peterburg: OAO “Gazprom”, 2016, 44 p.
6. Rekomendacii po uchetu vliyaniya tekhniko-tekhnologicheskih, prirodno-klimaticheskih i drugih faktorov pri prognozirovanii avarijnosti na magistral'nyh gazoprovodah OAO “Gazprom” (utverzhdeny OAO «Gazprom» 27.03.2007). M.: OOO “VNIIGAZ”, 2006, 117 p.
7. STO Gazprom 2-2.3-351-2009. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po provedeniyu analiza riska dlya opasnyh proizvodstvennyh ob’’ektov gazotransportnyh predpriyatij. M: OOO “Gazprom ekspo”, 2009, 385 p.
8. Pendin V.V., Fomenko I.K. Metodologiya ocenki i prognoza opolznevoj opasnosti. M.: URSS, 2014, 294 p.
9. Emel’yanova E.P. Osnovnye zakonomernosti opolznevyh processov. M.: Nedra, 1972, 310 p.
10. Bespal’ko A.A. Fizicheskie osnovy i realizaciya metoda elektromagnitnoj emissii dlya monitoringa i kratkosrochnogo prognoza izmenenij napryazhenno-deformirovannogo sostoyaniya gornyh porod: Avtoref. diss. na soisk. uch. step. dokt. Tekhn. nauk: 05.11.13. Tomsk: Nac. issled. Tomsky politekhn. un-t, 2019, 44 p.
11. SP 11-105–97. Svod pravil. Inzhenerno-geologicheskie izyskaniya dlya stroitel’stva. CHast’ VI. Pravila proizvodstva geofizicheskih issledovanij. M.: FGUP PNIIIS, 2004, 54 p.
12. Zaderigolova M.M., Lopatin A.S. Kriterii ocenki prognozirovaniya vnezapnoj opasnosti katastroficheskih aktivizacij gruntov okolotrubnogo prostranstva//Oborudovanie i tekhnologii dlya neftegazovogo kompleksa, 2018, no. 6, p. 73–80. DOI: 10.30713/1999-6934-2018-6-73-80
13. Zaderigolova M.M., Lopatin A.S. Primenenie radiovolnovogo metoda kontrolya dlya obespecheniya bezopasnosti gazotransportnyh sistem. M.: RGU nefti i gaza imeni I.M. Gubkina, 2014, 72 p.
14. Lyapichev D.M., Lopatin A.S. Monitoring tekhnicheskogo sostoyaniya gazoprovodov: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Izd. centr RGU nefti i gaza (NIU) imeni I.M. Gubkina, 2021, 216 p.