«Proceedings of Gubkin University»

Physical and geological model for detecting ecoanomalies in oil contaminated environments

UDC: 332.368
DOI: -

Authors:

¹ National University of Oil and Gas “Gubkin University”, Moscow, Russian Federation

Keywords: analytical interpretation, geophysical methods, interpretation, model, reliability, oil-contaminated environment, eco-anomaly, environmental efficiency

Annotation:

The purpose of this work is to substantiate and algorithmize the implementation of a physical-geological model of the source of eco-anomalies (PGME) to increase the reliability of identifying eco-anomalies and the information value of the study of the nature of their distribution in relation to oil-contaminated environments. The structural and dynamic interpretation includes the information and analytical implementation of the model under consideration within the framework of the accepted model representations of geospatial data. A method for determining the formed eco-anomalies based on geophysical studies is proposed. When developing the methodology, an information and analytical model is used to determine which estimates of information value and environmental efficiency are calculated. The structural and dynamic interpretation includes the information and analytical implementation of the PGME within the framework of accepted model representations of geospatial data. To assess the reliability of detection of eco-anomalies, the corresponding probability integral is applied, taking into account the continuous probability distribution function.

Bibliography:

1. Mesto ekologo-geofizicheskih issledovanij v sisteme urboekologii / V.T. Trofimov, A.D. Zhigalin, V.A. Bogoslovskij, E.V. Arhipova // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 4. Geologiya. – 2016. – S. 3–9.
2. Vasilev A.V., Bykov D.E., Pimenov A.A. Methods and results of environmental monitoring of soil pollution by oily waste // HERITAGE and TECHNOLOGY. Mind Knowledge Experience: Le Vie dei Mercanti. XIII Forum Internazionale di Studi, Aversa Capri, 11–13 June 2015. – Aversa Capri: La Scuola di Pitagora s.r.l., 2015. – P. 85–89.
3. Primenenie RGB-sinteza dlya kompleksnoj interpretacii dannyh geofizicheskih metodov pri izuchenii territorij, zagryaznennyh nefteproduktami / T.A. Mingaleva, S.V. SHakuro, N.P. Senchina, A.S. Egorov // Geosistemy perekhodnyh zon. – 2023. – T. 7, № 1. – S. 75–85.
4. Ostah S.V., Mironova O.S. Mul’tiscenarnoe prognozirovanie posledstvij glubinnogo neftyanogo zagryazneniya pochvennyh ob’’ektov // Zashchita okruzhayushchej sredy v neftegazovom komplekse. – 2014. – № 9. – S. 47–51.
5. Meshalkin V.P., Ostakh S.V., Kusheeva V.S. Multifactor geochemical modeling of biodegradable subsurface hydrocarbon contamination // Chemical Engineering Transactions. – 2020. – Vol. 82. – P. 403–408.
6. Alekseenko V.A., Yurgenson G.A., Shvydkaya N.V. O vliyanii geohimicheskoj obstanovki na polimetallicheskih mestorozhdeniyah na biogeohimicheskie i geobotanicheskie osobennosti rastenij // Vestnik ZabGU. – 2017. – № 8. – S. 4–11.
7. Kompleksirovanie informacii o raznomasshtabnyh neodnorodnostyah pri geologicheskom modelirovanii zalezhej nefti i gaza / P.N. Strahov, E.A. Davydova, K.G. Sachek, Yu.G. Eremin // Neftyanoe hozyajstvo. – 2020. – № 7. – S. 82–87.
8. Pevneva A.G., Kalinkina M.E. Metody optimizacii. – SPb.: Universitet ITMO, 2020. – 64 s.
9. Kalinin A.G. Obrabotka dannyh metodami matematicheskoj statistiki: monografiya. – Chita: ZIP SibUPK, 2015. – 106 s.
10. Elektrorazvedka / pod. red. V.K. Hmelevskogo, V.M. Bondarenko. – M.: Nedra, 1989. – S. 27–31.
11. Vydelenie opasnyh inzhenerno-geologicheskih processov geofizicheskimi metodami / N.N. Grib, P.Yu. Kuznecov, A.A. Syas’ko, A.V. Kachaev // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. – 2015. – № 2-2. – 740 s.
12. Tashevskij A.G. Verifikaciya rezul’tatov ispytanij slozhnyh tekhnicheskih sistem // Global’naya energiya. – 2013. – № 2 (171). – S. 203–210.
13. Cygankova M.V. Territorial’naya differenciaciya rezhimov prirodopol’zovaniya na landshaftnoj osnove // Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. – 2017. – № 2. – S. 168–172.
14. Blok obrabotki geofizicheskih dannyh dlya resheniya prognoznyh zadach / V.I. Galuev, A.S. Levin, S.S. Malinina, N.N. Pimanova. – M.: MPR, GNC VNIIgeosistem, 2000. – 62 s.
15. Geofizicheskie metody issledovaniya nakopitelej neftesoderzhashchih othodov / A.I. Mashkova, O.V. Tupicyna, S.V. Isaev [i dr.] // Neft’. Gaz. Novacii. – 2021. – № 6 (247). – S. 72–76.
16. Geofizicheskie metody izyskanij v proektah likvidacii ob’’ektov nakoplennogo ekologicheskogo vreda / K.L. Chertes, A.A. Bukin, V.N. Pystin [i dr.] // Molodye – Naukam o Zemle: Tezisy dokladov X Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii molodyh uchenyh. V 7-mi tomah, Moskva, 31 marta 2022 g. / Redkollegiya: Yu.P. Panov, R.N. Mustaev. Tom 3. – M.: Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj geologorazvedochnyj universitet im. S. Ordzhonikidze. – 2022. – S. 295–298.
17. Kosinova I.I. Analiticheskij obzor metodov prognozirovaniya ekologicheskoj situacii pri inzhenerno-ekologicheskih izyskaniyah // Inzhenerno-ekologicheskie izyskaniya – normativno-pravovaya baza, sovremennye metody i oborudovanie: Materialy dokladov Obshcherossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, Moskva, 22–23 marta 2018 g. – M.: Geomarketing, 2018. – S. 63–67.