Top.Mail.Ru

Scientific and technical journal

«Environmental protection in oil and gas complex»

ISSN 2411-7013

Assessment of the detoxifying ability of humic acids in relation to hexavalent chromium in drilling sludge

UDC: 544.77.052.5
DOI: -

Authors:

DMITRIEVA ELENA D.1,
GRECHISHCHEVA NATALIA YU.2,
BIRYUKOV ANDREY V.2

1 Tula State University, Tula, Russia
2 National University of Oil and Gas "Gubkin University", Moscow, Russia

Keywords: heavy metals, humic acids, detoxification, biological testing, chromium (VI), biosorption, drilling sludge, oil and gas complex, ecology

Annotation:

When studying problem of environmental pollution with hexavalent chromium Cr(VI), it was found that its sources are spent drilling fluids and sludge pits. The mechanisms of toxic effects of Cr(VI) on living organisms are analyzed. The possibility of using humic acids of reed lowland peat as an environmentally friendly detoxifier is considered. The detoxifying capacity of humic acids of reed lowland peat in relation to Cr(VI) in aquatic and soil environments was studied by the biological testing method using duckweed and garden cress as test objects. It was determined that at a Cr(VI) concentration of 25 MAC (maximum allowable concentration) in the aquatic environment, toxicity decreased from 69 to 6 % in the presence of humic acids of reed lowland peat. It was revealed that in inert soil the maximum reduction in Cr(VI) toxicity was observed at a concentration of 10 MAC making 20 %. The calculated detoxification coefficients showed that the maximum value of D was 91 % in the aquatic environment at a Cr(VI) concentration of 25 MAC. It was shown that humic acids of reed lowland peat are capable of reducing the toxicity of Cr(VI) by reducing it to trivalent chromium Cr(III) and forming non-toxic complexes. Recommendations for using humic acids of reed lowland peat in remediation measures to minimize secondary pollution by chromium-containing drilling sludge are proposed.

Bibliography:

1. Sharova O.A. Ekologicheskie aspekty protsessa bureniya i sposoby utilizatsii burovykh otkhodov // Geologiya, geografiya i global'naya energiya. – 2009. – № 4(35). – S. 29–36.
2. Soromotin A.V., Pislegin D.V. Tyazhelye metally v donnykh otlozheniyakh shlamovykh ambarov geologorazvedochnykh skvazhin Zapadnoy Sibiri // Geoekologiya. Inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya. – 2015. – № 6. – S. 514–520.
3. Distribution of Chromium Contamination and Microbial Activity in Soil Aggregates / T.K. Tokunaga, Wan Jiamin, T.C. Hazen [et al.] // J. of Environmental Quality. – 2003. – Vol. 32, Issue 2. – P. 541–549. – DOI: 10.2134/jeq2003.0541
4. Microbial chromate reductases: novel and potent mediators in chromium – bioremediation - a review / J.G.S. Mala, S. Takeuchi, D. Sujatha, U. Mani // Applied Microbiology: Theory & Technology. – 2020. – Vol. 1, Issue 1. – P. 32–44. – DOI: 10.37256/amtt.112020222
5. Khimicheskie osnovy toksicheskogo deystviya tyazhelykh metallov (obzor) / S.G. Skugoreva, T.Ya. Ashikhmina, A.I. Fokina, E.I. Lyalina // Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekologiya. – 2016. – № 1. – S. 4–13.
6. In Vitro Plasmid DNA Cleavage by Chromium(V) and -(IV) 2-Hydroxycarboxylato Complexes / A. Levina, G. Barr-David, R. Codd [et al.] // Chemical Research in Toxicology. – 1999. – Vol. 12, Issue 4. – P. 371–381. – DOI: 10.1021/tx980229g
7. Bushuev N.N., Shuravin A.V. Vliyanie vneseniya osadkov stochnykh vod na zagryaznenie pochv tyazhelymi metallami // Plodorodie. – 2014. – № 4(79). – S. 40–41.
8. Recent advances in removal techniques of Cr (VI) toxic ion from aqueous solution: A comprehensive review / H. Karimi-Maleh, A. Ayati, S. Ghanbari [et al.] // J. of Molecular Liquids. – 2021. – Vol. 329. – P. 115062. – DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.115062
9. Guminovyy biokompozit s khromatredutsiruyushchimi mikroorganizmami aktivnogo ila dlya inaktivatsii khroma (VI) v vodnykh sredakh / A.A. Kovaleva, E.D. Dmitrieva, S.V. Alferov, P.V. Os'kin // Izv. TulGU. Estestvennye nauki. – 2024. – № 1. – S. 50–62. – DOI: 10.24412/2071-6176-2024-1-50-62
10. Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to chromium compounds / M.I. Ramírez-Díaz, S. Díaz-Pérez, E. Vargas [et al.] // BioMetals. – 2008. – Vol. 21. – P. 321–332. – DOI: 10.1007/s10534-007-9121-8
11. Proteomic analysis of the reduction and resistance mechanisms of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 under long-term hexavalent chromium stress / Gang Haiyin, Xiao Changye, Xiao Yong [et al.] // Environment Int. – 2019. – Vol. 127. – P. 94–102. – DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.016
12. Humic substances as electron acceptors for anaerobic oxidation of methane driven by ANME-2d / Bai Ya-Nan, Wang Xiu-Ning, Wu Jun [et al.] // Water Research. – 2019. – Vol. 164. – P. 114935. – DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114935
13. Mechanism study of humic acid functional groups for Cr(VI) retention: Two-dimensional FTIR and 13C CP/MAS NMR correlation spectroscopic analysis / Zhang Jia, Chen Linpeng, Yin Huilin [et al.] // Environmental Pollution. – 2017. – Vol. 225. – P. 86–92. – DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.03.047
14. Humic acid and nano-zeolite NaX as low cost and eco-friendly adsorbents for removal of Pb (II) and Cd (II) from water: characterization, kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic studies / M.S. Masoud, A.A. Zidan, G.M. El Zokm [et al.] // Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. – 2024. – Vol. 14, Issue 3. – P. 3615–3632. – DOI: 10.1007/s13399-022-02608-9
15. GOST 31956-2012. Voda. Metody opredeleniya khroma (VI) i obshchego khroma. – Vved. 2014–01–01. – M.: Standartinform, 2014. – III, 43 s.
16. Starodubtseva K.A., Zavorotnyy V.L., Grechishcheva N.Yu. Issledovanie zakonomernostey poverkhnostno-aktivnykh i ekotoksikologicheskikh svoystv aminoamidov oleinovoy kisloty // Zashchita okruzhayushchey sredy v neftegazovom komplekse. – 2023. – № 1(310). – S. 5–12. – DOI: 10.33285/2411-7013-2023-1(310)-5-12
17. Issledovanie stabiliziruyushchey i dispergiruyushchey sposobnosti guminovo-glinistykh kompleksov po otnosheniyu k neftyanomu zagryazneniyu vodnykh sred / N.Yu. Grechishcheva, V.A. Kholodov, A.M. Parfenova [i dr.] // Tr. RGU nefti i gaza im. I.M. Gubkina. – 2017. – № 1(286). – S. 133–145.
18. Ferrer I., Zweigenbaum J.A., Thurman E.M. Analysis of 70 Environmental Protection Agency priority pharmaceuticals in water by EPA Method 1694 // J. Chromatography A. – 2010. – Vol. 1217, Issue 36. – P. 5674–5686. – DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.07.002
19. Detoksikatsiya otrabotannykh sinteticheskikh motornykh masel biokompozitsiyami na osnove guminovykh kislot v vode / N.Yu. Grechishcheva, E.D. Dmitrieva, K.A. Starodubtseva, V.L. Zavorotnyy // Izv. vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Ser. Khimiya i khim. tekhnologiya. – 2024. – T. 67, № 2. – S. 119–125. – DOI: 10.6060/ivkkt.20246702.6895
20. Mediating effects of humic substances in the contaminated environments. Concepts, results, and prospects / I.V. Perminova, N.A. Kulikova, D.M. Zhilin [et al.] // Viable Methods of Soil and Water Pollution Monitoring, Protection and Remediation: Conf. proceedings / I. Twardowska, H.E. Allen, M.M. Häggblom, S. Stefaniak (eds). – NATO Science Series IV. Earth and Environmental Sciences. Vol. 69. – Netherlands: Springer, 2006. – P. 249–273. – DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-4728-2_17